What do you do when your business is in a bind? Listen to what this blogger has to say.
QSRweb.com recently contacted yours truly for some expert insight regarding the dilemma surrounding McDonald’s and its former employee, Nigel Haskett. In short, Haskett was shot three times while trying to protect a female customer from being beaten – an act which resulted in three surgeries and $300,000 in medical bills. The case is now before the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission after the McDonald's owner's workers' compensation insurance company rejected the claim, stating that Haskett's injuries did not occur in the course and scope of his employment. At the time, McDonald's owner/operator Ray Nosler did not have a statement prepared but has since issued one: "My highest priority is the safety and security of my customers and employees. I stand behind Nigel Haskett. I believe he acted as a Good Samaritan. Concerning the critical matter of his medical expenses, it is important to note that the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission ultimately decides the outcome of his claim. As part of this process, Nigel's case will be presented to a workers' compensation judge, who will review all of the facts and decide on the case's merits. McDonald's supports Nigel's claim, and fully anticipates the judge in this process to find in Nigel's favor. As a safeguard, if for some reason his claim is denied, and other insurance options are unavailable, I intend to cover the cost of his medical expenses. I’m doing this because it’s the right thing to do."
This blogger’s advice? Issuing such a statement quickly is important in crisis communications: "While attorneys do limit what they can discuss (regarding pending legal matters), I would never not comment. That's the worse thing you can do. The only thing I wouldn't comment on is any kind of admission of liability." A situation like the Haskett case puts employers in a difficult spot. Operators have policies in place to protect their employees and their customers, and those policies need to be followed and enforced. But when it comes down to a public relations crisis in which the corporation or operator is depicted as inhuman and uncaring, a compassionate response is the better course of action. The corporation is faced with condoning an action that put someone in danger versus helping an employee who has come to be regarded as a hero and now a victim. "If I were their PR person, I would recommend they cover the bills and make a big deal of it — with the caveat that we do not encourage this behavior. It's important that they explain why they discourage this behavior while pointing out that he reacted as a human being." Nosler's offer to pay for the expenses if they are denied by the workers' compensation commission also recommended. "It may not be covered by workers’ comp, but there are other things you can do for them. You can still express regard for his human response. The important thing is to get the public's trust again."
Photo: Rhonda Sanderson, founder and president of Chicago-based Sanderson & Associates.